Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Armac Group stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortArmac Group(You)Kier ConstructionSeddon Construction LimitedJohn Sisk and Son LtdBIRCH TREE NORTHERN LIMITEDBarnes Construction
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | SC Seddon Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #3 | BT BIRCH TREE NORTHERN LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AG Armac Group (You) · target supplier | BC Barnes Construction Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £345.0m | £4.6m | £67k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £1.9bn | £271.7m | £11.7m | £13.6m(−95%) | £80.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 36 | 21 | 1 | 3 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —