Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Reesink stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortReesink(You)F.R. SHARROCK LIMITEDLister WilderBalmers Garden MachineryErnest Doe & Sons LimitedT H White Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | FS F.R. SHARROCK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | LW Lister Wilder Peer · rank #2 | BG Balmers Garden Machinery Peer · rank #3 | ED Ernest Doe & Sons Limited Peer · rank #4 | TH T H White Limited Peer · rank #5 | RE Reesink (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.1m | £1.3m | £1.3m | £976k | £821k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £23.5m | £31.1m | £3.9m | £7.7m | £28.5m | £157k(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 21 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 10 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —