Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Fiddes & Son Ltd T/A Bowcom stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortFiddes & Son Ltd T/A Bowcom(You)M&J Group (Construction & Roofing) LtdEQUANS Regeneration LimitedHankinson Whittle LimitedHERTS HERITAGE BUILDING AND ROOFING LIMITEDRingway Infrastructure Services Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MG M&J Group (Construction & Roofing) Ltd Peer · rank #1 | ER EQUANS Regeneration Limited Peer · rank #2 | HW Hankinson Whittle Limited Peer · rank #3 | HH HERTS HERITAGE BUILDING AND ROOFING LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | F& Fiddes & Son Ltd T/A Bowcom (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £290.3m | £162.1m | £31.3m | £29.4m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £214.4m | — | — | — | — | £2.0bn |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1bn | £2.3bn | £54.1m | £41.8m | £2k(−100%) | £4.8bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 19 | 20 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —