Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Edible Estates stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEdible Estates(You)Places For People Leisure Management LimitedParkwood Leisure LimitedSport and Leisure ManagementLeisure FocusAnsco Music Club Ltd
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PF Places For People Leisure Management Limited Peer · rank #1 | PL Parkwood Leisure Limited Peer · rank #2 | EE Edible Estates (You) · target supplier | SA Sport and Leisure Management Peer · rank #4 | LF Leisure Focus Peer · rank #5 | AM Ansco Music Club Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £39.0m | £4.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £120.0m | £70.1m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £166.0m | £213.9m | — | £379.1m | £200.0m | £37.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 4 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —