Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Global Technical Services stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGlobal Technical Services(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCIBM United Kingdom LimitedBoxxe LimitedErnst and Young LLPEntrust Corporation
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | IU IBM United Kingdom Limited Peer · rank #2 | BO Boxxe Limited Peer · rank #3 | EA Ernst and Young LLP Peer · rank #4 | GT Global Technical Services (You) · target supplier | EN Entrust Corporation Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £641.7m | £469.6m | £53.5m | £42.7m | £48k(−100%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £357.6m | £2.5m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £3.6bn | £1.1bn | £110.5m | £48k(−100%) | £20.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 38 | 35 | 79 | 6 | 1(−97%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —