Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Conservation Matters stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortConservation Matters(You)CONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITEDKOMPAN LtdGlendale Countryside LtdTreehab LimitedID Verde
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CC CONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | KO KOMPAN Ltd Peer · rank #2 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #3 | CM Conservation Matters (You) · target supplier | TR Treehab Limited Peer · rank #5 | IV ID Verde Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £11.1m | £6.1m | £641k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £390k | £174k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £62.1m | £64.1m | £180.4m | £50k(−100%) | £4.8m | £3.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 40 | 16 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —