Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Halo stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHalo(You)SoftcatCOMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITEDPhoenix Software LimitedPALLADIUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITEDMedequip Assistive Technology Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | C( COMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #3 | HA Halo (You) · target supplier | PI PALLADIUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | MA Medequip Assistive Technology Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £479.9m | £95.4m | £74.5m | £750k(−99%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £105.2m | £7.5m | £488k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £1.4bn | £75.3m | £9.2m(−99%) | £1.7bn | £822.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 481 | 76 | 28 | 1(−96%) | 4 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —