Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Lane, Clark and Peacock LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLane, Clark and Peacock LLP(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDCACI LIMITEDBaringa Partners LLPFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDInvestigo Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CA CACI LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BP Baringa Partners LLP Peer · rank #3 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | IN Investigo Limited Peer · rank #5 | LC Lane, Clark and Peacock LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £518.2m | £47.5m | £20.7m | £10.5m | £4.0m | £314k(−98%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | — | £10.7m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.2bn | £158.4m | £166.9m | £247.2m | £132.5m | £5.8m(−97%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 29 | 21 | 19 | 29 | 5 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —