Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Charles Hughes Ltd. stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCharles Hughes Ltd.(You)BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTDLYRECO UK LIMITEDBanner LimitedWightman & Parrish LtdARROW COUNTY SUPPLIES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BO BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTD Peer · rank #1 | LU LYRECO UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BA Banner Limited Peer · rank #3 | W& Wightman & Parrish Ltd Peer · rank #4 | CH Charles Hughes Ltd. (You) · target supplier | AC ARROW COUNTY SUPPLIES LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.3m | £5.2m | £3.7m | £500k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £750k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £426.9m | £353.7m | £56.8m | £25.0m | — | £69.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 24 | 29 | 3 | 1 | — | 5 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —