Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How G H JAMES CYF stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortG H JAMES CYF(You)Kier ConstructionESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDCompass Developments (NE) LimitedBarnes ConstructionAmeresco Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CD Compass Developments (NE) Limited Peer · rank #3 | BC Barnes Construction Peer · rank #4 | GH G H JAMES CYF (You) · target supplier | AM Ameresco Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £90.7m | £5.4m | £3.9m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £1.0m | £2.5m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £1.5bn | £72.2m | £80.1m | — | £2.1bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 28 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —