Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Oughtred & Harrison (Facilities) Ltd t/a O&H Vehicle Tec stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 19 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortOughtred & Harrison (Facilities) Ltd t/a O&H Vehicle Tec(You)AtosWas Vehicles (UK) LimitedFaun Zoeller (UK) LimitedCENTREBUS LIMITEDCompass Travel (Sussex) Ltd
iAuto-picked from 19 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AT Atos Peer · rank #1 | WV Was Vehicles (UK) Limited Peer · rank #2 | FZ Faun Zoeller (UK) Limited Peer · rank #3 | CE CENTREBUS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | O& Oughtred & Harrison (Facilities) Ltd t/a O&H Vehicle Tec (You) · target supplier | CT Compass Travel (Sussex) Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £87.7m | £15.3m | £8.4m | £609k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.2m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £6.3bn | £36.1m | £153.9m | £9.6m | £123.4m(+242%) | £34.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —