Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How OMACAB stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortOMACAB(You)Mellors CateringCH&Co GroupSport and Leisure ManagementViaVanBlue Pepper Catering Limited
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MC Mellors Catering Peer · rank #1 | CG CH&Co Group Peer · rank #2 | OM OMACAB (You) · target supplier | SA Sport and Leisure Management Peer · rank #4 | VI ViaVan Peer · rank #5 | BP Blue Pepper Catering Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £11.1m | £6.6m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £30.9m | £14.2m | — | £379.1m | £5.5m | £2.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —