Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SEE Tickets stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSEE Tickets(You)TicketsolveFernbank Advertising LimitedThe Lowry Centre Ltd trading as QuayticketsNAGELS (UK) LTD
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TI Ticketsolve Peer · rank #1 | ST SEE Tickets (You) · target supplier | FA Fernbank Advertising Limited Peer · rank #3 | TL The Lowry Centre Ltd trading as Quaytickets Peer · rank #4 | N( NAGELS (UK) LTD Peer · rank #5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £114k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £385k | £246k(−52%) | £690k | £125k | £643k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | — | — | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | |||||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —