Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Clay Technology AB stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortClay Technology AB(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCBridewell Consulting LimitedGoonhilly Earth StationXEWLI LIMITEDSUSTENIC LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | BC Bridewell Consulting Limited Peer · rank #2 | GE Goonhilly Earth Station Peer · rank #3 | CT Clay Technology AB (You) · target supplier | XE XEWLI LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SU SUSTENIC LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £641.7m | £7.4m | £4.5m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £5.0m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £43.6m | £7.2m | £14k(−100%) | £19.9m | £2.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 38 | 9 | 3 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —