Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How LUC stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLUC(You)PICK EVERARDMace Consult LimitedEon UK Green Funding Solutions LimitedUCL Consultants LtdIpsos Mori
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PE PICK EVERARD Peer · rank #1 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #2 | EU Eon UK Green Funding Solutions Limited Peer · rank #3 | UC UCL Consultants Ltd Peer · rank #4 | IM Ipsos Mori Peer · rank #5 | LU LUC (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.1bn | £70.7m | £35.9m | £7.1m | £4.2m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £2.6m | — | — | £4.0m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.2bn | £738.3m | £76.5m | £49.5m | £137.2m | £247k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 23 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 6 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —