Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Andrew Innes joinery stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAndrew Innes joinery(You)Matthews and TannertNationwide Windows UK LtdELM SITE SERVICES LIMITEDNationcare Windows LtdAmeresco Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #1 | AI Andrew Innes joinery (You) · target supplier | NW Nationwide Windows UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | ES ELM SITE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | NW Nationcare Windows Ltd Peer · rank #5 | AM Ameresco Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £6.7m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £631k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £207.3m | — | £17.3m | £9.1m | £13.2m | £2.1bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | — | — | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —