Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How R.C.Grant and Sons ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortR.C.Grant and Sons ltd(You)EQUANS Regeneration LimitedBELL GROUP LTDSYNERGIZE LTDNOVUS PROPERTY SOLUTIONS LIMITEDMEARS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ER EQUANS Regeneration Limited Peer · rank #1 | BG BELL GROUP LTD Peer · rank #2 | SY SYNERGIZE LTD Peer · rank #3 | NP NOVUS PROPERTY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | ME MEARS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | RA R.C.Grant and Sons ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £192.2m | £102.0m | £62.3m | £59.9m | £29.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.3bn | £406.0m | £159.3m | £1.2bn | £4.2bn | £1.2m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 19 | 48 | 6 | 13 | 5 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —