Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How thyssenkrupp stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohortthyssenkrupp(You)Guideline Lift Services LimitedApex Lift & Escalator Engineers LimitedAmalgamated Lifts LtdMEARS LIMITEDRJ Lift Services Limited
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GL Guideline Lift Services Limited Peer · rank #1 | AL Apex Lift & Escalator Engineers Limited Peer · rank #2 | AL Amalgamated Lifts Ltd Peer · rank #3 | ME MEARS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | TH thyssenkrupp (You) · target supplier | RL RJ Lift Services Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.2m | £336k | £243k | £81k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £39.3m | £67.6m | £47.7m | £4.2bn | £4.0m(−94%) | £113.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —