Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NOT AWARDED TO SUPPLIER stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNOT AWARDED TO SUPPLIER(You)KPMG LLPPhoenix Software LimitedASPENS-SERVICES LIMITEDUNITE PROCUREMENT UK LIMITEDCompass Developments (NE) Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #2 | AS ASPENS-SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | UP UNITE PROCUREMENT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | CD Compass Developments (NE) Limited Peer · rank #5 | NA NOT AWARDED TO SUPPLIER (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £294.1m | £8.3m | £4.0m | £663k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £471k | — | — | £2.5m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £3.7bn | £8.3m | £12.5m | £72.2m | £234k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 220 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1(−83%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —