Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How N/A stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 16 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortN/A(You)Sopra Steria LimitedAllpay LimitedMatthews and TannertTriple Line Consulting LtdInspire Suffolk
iAuto-picked from 16 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SS Sopra Steria Limited Peer · rank #1 | AL Allpay Limited Peer · rank #2 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #3 | N/ N/A (You) · target supplier | TL Triple Line Consulting Ltd Peer · rank #5 | IS Inspire Suffolk Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £29.2m | £11.3m | £7.1m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £631k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.2bn | £210.3m | £207.7m | £2.3m(−99%) | £4.5m | £1.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 37 | 10 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —