Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How HMS stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHMS(You)Tilbury DouglasNationwide Engineering LtdJOHN PERKINS CONSTRUCTION LTDT&C Williams (Builders) Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TD Tilbury Douglas Peer · rank #1 | HM HMS (You) · target supplier | NE Nationwide Engineering Ltd Peer · rank #3 | JP JOHN PERKINS CONSTRUCTION LTD Peer · rank #4 | TW T&C Williams (Builders) Ltd Peer · rank #5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £354.3m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £1.2m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £770.9m | — | £8.6m | £3.2m | £4.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 30 | — | — | 2 | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 92 | ||||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —