Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Total PlayLtd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTotal PlayLtd(You)CYCLESCHEME LIMITEDAirquee LtdHS SPORTS LIMITED (t/a APG Leisure)Clark & Kent ContractorsTechnogym
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TP Total PlayLtd (You) · target supplier | CY CYCLESCHEME LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | AI Airquee Ltd Peer · rank #3 | HS HS SPORTS LIMITED (t/a APG Leisure) Peer · rank #4 | C& Clark & Kent Contractors Peer · rank #5 | TE Technogym Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £600k(−11%) | £1.6m | £80k | £599k | £1.1m | £674k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | — | — | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —