Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MMGY stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMMGY(You)Ernst and Young LLPHanover Communications International LtdVuelioSustransPolitical Lobbying & Media Relations Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EA Ernst and Young LLP Peer · rank #1 | HC Hanover Communications International Ltd Peer · rank #2 | VU Vuelio Peer · rank #3 | SU Sustrans Peer · rank #4 | MM MMGY (You) · target supplier | PL Political Lobbying & Media Relations Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £42.7m | £1.6m | £150k | £125k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £110.5m | £5.2m | £832k | £12.7m | — | £857k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —