Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How FFC Waste Services (UK) Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortFFC Waste Services (UK) Limited(You)BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITEDRestore Datashred LimitedSHRED-IT LIMITEDIndaver Rivenhall LimitedSRCL LIMITED T/A STERICYCLE
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BW BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | RD Restore Datashred Limited Peer · rank #2 | SH SHRED-IT LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | FW FFC Waste Services (UK) Limited (You) · target supplier | IR Indaver Rivenhall Limited Peer · rank #5 | SL SRCL LIMITED T/A STERICYCLE Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £203.4m | £374k | £35k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £45k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £129.8m | £64.9m | £510.0m(+293%) | £1.1bn | £52.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 5 | 2 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —