Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Blyth Harbour Commission T/A Port of Blyth stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBlyth Harbour Commission T/A Port of Blyth(You)MOMART LIMITEDRestore Harrow GreenQUEEN ANNES BATTERY T/A MARINA DEVELOPMENTS LTD
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MO MOMART LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | RH Restore Harrow Green Peer · rank #2 | BH Blyth Harbour Commission T/A Port of Blyth (You) · target supplier | QA QUEEN ANNES BATTERY T/A MARINA DEVELOPMENTS LTD Peer · rank #4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £603k | £494k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.6m | £103.8m | — | £40k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 2 | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 25 | 18 | 1(−94%) | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —