Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M J Dexter Plant Hire stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortM J Dexter Plant Hire(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDKIELY BROS. LIMITEDCONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITEDDawsongroup Environmental Municipal Civil LtdManz AG
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | KB KIELY BROS. LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CC CONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | DE Dawsongroup Environmental Municipal Civil Ltd Peer · rank #4 | MJ M J Dexter Plant Hire (You) · target supplier | MA Manz AG Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £83.7m | £19.6m | £11.1m | £4.6m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £433.5m | £62.1m | £53.2m | £2.8m(−96%) | £5.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 27 | 27 | 3 | 8 | 1(−94%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —