Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Intact Insurance stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortIntact Insurance(You)Marsh LimitedAon Underwriting ManagersProtector InsuranceZurich MunicipalZurich Insurance Company Ltd trading as Zurich Municipal
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Marsh Limited Peer · rank #1 | AU Aon Underwriting Managers Peer · rank #2 | PI Protector Insurance Peer · rank #3 | ZM Zurich Municipal Peer · rank #4 | II Intact Insurance (You) · target supplier | ZI Zurich Insurance Company Ltd trading as Zurich Municipal Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £25.6m | £10.4m | £6.0m | £1.4m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £75k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £348.8m | £59.4m | £118.4m | £220.0m | — | £17.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 28 | 10 | 7 | 28 | 2(−89%) | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —