Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Chambers and Harrison stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortChambers and Harrison(You)Kier ConstructionESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDHenry Boot Construction LimitedCompass Developments (NE) LimitedBarnes Construction
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | HB Henry Boot Construction Limited Peer · rank #3 | CD Compass Developments (NE) Limited Peer · rank #4 | CA Chambers and Harrison (You) · target supplier | BC Barnes Construction Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £56.4m | £3.7m | £663k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £1.0m | — | £2.5m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £1.5bn | £775.5m | £72.2m | £49k(−100%) | £80.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 30 | 2 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —