Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Gooch & Housego (Ohio) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGooch & Housego (Ohio)(You)BRUKER UK LIMITEDFEI UK LIMITEDSCIENTIFIC LABORATORY SUPPLIES LIMITEDTSQUARED P2 LIMITEDKyma S.p.A.
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BU BRUKER UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | FU FEI UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | SL SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY SUPPLIES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | G& Gooch & Housego (Ohio) (You) · target supplier | TP TSQUARED P2 LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | KS Kyma S.p.A. Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.2m | £1.6m | £167k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £90.9m | £41.2m | £107.2m | £73k(−100%) | £20.6m | £2.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 13 | 2 | 9 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —