Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Birmingham Settlement stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBirmingham Settlement(You)CARE COVE LIMITEDEndeavour TrainingAffinity TrustCommunity Integrated CarePROPS North East
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CC CARE COVE LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | ET Endeavour Training Peer · rank #2 | AT Affinity Trust Peer · rank #3 | BS Birmingham Settlement (You) · target supplier | CI Community Integrated Care Peer · rank #5 | PN PROPS North East Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.7m | £3.7m | £1.0m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.7m | £3.9m | £189.3m | £398k(−90%) | £255.9m | £2.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 1 | 3 | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —