Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MAND stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMAND(You)BAM Nuttall LtdJacobs UK LtdCLASSIC LIFTS LTDAmalgamated Lifts LtdRJ Lift Services Limited
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BN BAM Nuttall Ltd Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | CL CLASSIC LIFTS LTD Peer · rank #3 | AL Amalgamated Lifts Ltd Peer · rank #4 | MA MAND (You) · target supplier | RL RJ Lift Services Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £63.5m | £47.9m | £1.6m | £503k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £27k | £264k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.1bn | £1.4bn | £85.9m | £47.7m | £2.1m(−98%) | £88.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 34 | 79 | 7 | 3 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —