Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Potters Waste Management stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPotters Waste Management(You)RECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDVeolia Environmental ServicesAGE UK COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIREH W MartinSmurfit Kappa Recycling
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | VE Veolia Environmental Services Peer · rank #2 | PW Potters Waste Management (You) · target supplier | AU AGE UK COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE Peer · rank #4 | HW H W Martin Peer · rank #5 | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £300k | £119k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5m | £638.5m | — | £19.5m | £15.2m | £24.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —