Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Pattersons (Bristol) Ltd | TA Pattersons West Midlands stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPattersons (Bristol) Ltd | TA Pattersons West Midlands(You)Nobisco LtdWightman & Parrish LtdR&R PACKAGING LIMITEDARROW COUNTY SUPPLIES LIMITEDNIVEK CATERING SUPPLIES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | NO Nobisco Ltd Peer · rank #1 | W& Wightman & Parrish Ltd Peer · rank #2 | RP R&R PACKAGING LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | P( Pattersons (Bristol) Ltd | TA Pattersons West Midlands (You) · target supplier | AC ARROW COUNTY SUPPLIES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | NC NIVEK CATERING SUPPLIES LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.7m | £500k | £309k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £30.9m | £25.0m | £309k | — | £69.3m | £1.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —