Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Esh Construction Limited R2: 3C 4C 6C 7C stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEsh Construction Limited R2: 3C 4C 6C 7C(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDTaylor Woodrow Infrastructure LimitedWhitemountain Quarries LtdHenry Boot Construction LimitedRingway Infrastructure Services Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | TW Taylor Woodrow Infrastructure Limited Peer · rank #2 | WQ Whitemountain Quarries Ltd Peer · rank #3 | HB Henry Boot Construction Limited Peer · rank #4 | EC Esh Construction Limited R2: 3C 4C 6C 7C (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £56.6m | £33.0m | £12.0m | £3.7m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | — | — | — | — | £2.0bn |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £162.5m | £27.0m | £775.5m | — | £4.8bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 9 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —