Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Austin-Smith Lord LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAustin-Smith Lord LLP(You)Turner & Townsend Project Management LtdReward Gateway (UK) LimitedMontagu Evans LLPVCARE-24 LIMITEDDERBY CITY MISSION LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #1 | RG Reward Gateway (UK) Limited Peer · rank #2 | ME Montagu Evans LLP Peer · rank #3 | VC VCARE-24 LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AL Austin-Smith Lord LLP (You) · target supplier | DC DERBY CITY MISSION LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £44.3m | £22.5m | £4.0m | £817k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £521.8m | £71.3m | £46.6m | £817k | £4.3m(−91%) | £715k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 23 | 17 | 20 | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —