Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How T.J.SMITH NEPHEW LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 17 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortT.J.SMITH NEPHEW LIMITED(You)MEDTRONIC LIMITEDNHS SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION LIMITED (NHSSC - SCCL)Ideal Medical SolutionsDICKINSON U.K. LIMITEDBECTON
iAuto-picked from 17 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ME MEDTRONIC LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | NS NHS SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION LIMITED (NHSSC - SCCL) Peer · rank #2 | IM Ideal Medical Solutions Peer · rank #3 | DU DICKINSON U.K. LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | BE BECTON Peer · rank #5 | TN T.J.SMITH NEPHEW LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £27.5m | £20.8m | £12.2m | £591k | £591k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £327k | £516k | — | £919k | £919k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £460.8m | £58.2m | £88.5m | £227.1m | £227.2m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 117 | 2 | 6 | 6 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —