Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NEBOSH stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNEBOSH(You)A to E Training SolutionsPeel RoleplayBirmingham leadership instituteNCSCT Community Interest CompanyWorksafe Training & Consultancy
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AT A to E Training Solutions Peer · rank #1 | NE NEBOSH (You) · target supplier | PR Peel Roleplay Peer · rank #3 | BL Birmingham leadership institute Peer · rank #4 | NC NCSCT Community Interest Company Peer · rank #5 | WT Worksafe Training & Consultancy Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £551k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8m | £96k(−95%) | £2.5m | £414k | £2.1m | £1.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | — | — | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —