Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How LiL’Langues stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLiL’Langues(You)The Colebridge Trust LtdNATIONAL CHILDREN'S BUREAURMF Training Academy3 V4 December 2023 Classification: OFFICIAL Conservation Centr&#
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TC The Colebridge Trust Ltd Peer · rank #1 | NC NATIONAL CHILDREN'S BUREAU Peer · rank #2 | LI LiL’Langues (You) · target supplier | RT RMF Training Academy Peer · rank #4 | 3V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £600k | £119k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £600k | £50.9m | — | £3.9m | £100k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 3 | — | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 1 | ||||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —