Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How GF Tomlinson stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGF Tomlinson(You)Kier ConstructionWillmott Dixon Construction LimitedBALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITEDGalliford Try Building LimitedJohn Sisk and Son Ltd
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | WD Willmott Dixon Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | BB BALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | GT Galliford Try Building Limited Peer · rank #4 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #5 | GT GF Tomlinson (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £4.2bn | £170.3m | £109.4m | £4.6m | £3.0m(−98%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £26.5m | — | £38.6m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £11.8bn | £3.6bn | £1.4bn | £271.7m | £319.6m(−91%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 44 | 10 | 12 | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —