Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TATE HARMER LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTATE HARMER LLP(You)Mace Consult LimitedCPC Project Services LLPBaily GarnerPRPBDP
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #1 | CP CPC Project Services LLP Peer · rank #2 | BG Baily Garner Peer · rank #3 | PR PRP Peer · rank #4 | BD BDP Peer · rank #5 | TH TATE HARMER LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £70.7m | £3.5m | £2.1m | £762k | £192k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.6m | £121k | £53k | — | £53k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £738.3m | £139.2m | £138.1m | £101.6m | £294.2m | £15.1m(−89%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 15 | 13 | 12 | 2 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —