Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ELA Group stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortELA Group(You)JACKSON LIFT SERVICES LIMITEDWEMAINTAIN TECHNOLOGIES LTDORONA LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | JL JACKSON LIFT SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | EG ELA Group (You) · target supplier | WT WEMAINTAIN TECHNOLOGIES LTD Peer · rank #3 | OR ORONA LIMITED Peer · rank #4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £665k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £36.9m | £697k(−95%) | £1.4m | £14.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | — | 4 | 5 |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 86 | 1(−98%) | 10 | 48 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —