Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Midlands Building and Maintenance Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMidlands Building and Maintenance Ltd(You)BALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITEDGalliford Try Building LimitedRE:GEN GROUP LTDKier Integrated ServicesWALTER LILLY & CO. LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BB BALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | GT Galliford Try Building Limited Peer · rank #2 | RG RE:GEN GROUP LTD Peer · rank #3 | KI Kier Integrated Services Peer · rank #4 | WL WALTER LILLY & CO. LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | MB Midlands Building and Maintenance Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £170.3m | £109.4m | £75.4m | £15.1m | £8.2m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £38.6m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.5bn | £1.4bn | £581.8m | £1.7bn | £60.9m | £1.6m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —