Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How John Nash Photography t/a John Nash Visuals stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJohn Nash Photography t/a John Nash Visuals(You)AECOM LIMITEDAllied Publicity Services (Manchester) LtdScroll LtdWM. NORTHAM & COMPANY LIMITEDMarcon Fit-Out Ltd
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | AP Allied Publicity Services (Manchester) Ltd Peer · rank #2 | SC Scroll Ltd Peer · rank #3 | JN John Nash Photography t/a John Nash Visuals (You) · target supplier | WN WM. NORTHAM & COMPANY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | MF Marcon Fit-Out Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £219.6m | £4.1m | £33k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.8m | £455.9m | £12.2m | — | £18.6m | £5.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 133 | 11 | 1 | — | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —