Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Not Awarding stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNot Awarding(You)Stryker UK LimitedGetinge LtdSTERIS SOLUTIONS LIMITEDNon AwardMedscience Distribution Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SU Stryker UK Limited Peer · rank #1 | GE Getinge Ltd Peer · rank #2 | SS STERIS SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | NA Not Awarding (You) · target supplier | NA Non Award Peer · rank #5 | MD Medscience Distribution Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £14.9m | £2.4m | £1.5m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £75k | £240k | £240k | — | — | £111k |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £190.9m | £77.5m | £69.7m | — | £341.6m | £67.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 16 | 11 | — | — | 5 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —