Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TYTO Robotics stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTYTO Robotics(You)Quantum DesignEngelmann & Buckham LtdHexagon Metrology LimitedLinton & Co (Engineering) Ltd t/ a LintonLAB PLANT UK LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | QD Quantum Design Peer · rank #1 | TR TYTO Robotics (You) · target supplier | E& Engelmann & Buckham Ltd Peer · rank #3 | HM Hexagon Metrology Limited Peer · rank #4 | L& Linton & Co (Engineering) Ltd t/ a Linton Peer · rank #5 | LP LAB PLANT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £286k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £6.1m | £36k(−95%) | £750k | £3.9m | £398k | £36k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | — | — | 2 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —