Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Gardiner Farm and Forest Services stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 13 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGardiner Farm and Forest Services(You)RSK Environment LtdTreehab LimitedID VerdeConnick Tree Services LtdTONY COOK LTD
iAuto-picked from 13 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | RE RSK Environment Ltd Peer · rank #1 | GF Gardiner Farm and Forest Services (You) · target supplier | TR Treehab Limited Peer · rank #3 | IV ID Verde Peer · rank #4 | CT Connick Tree Services Ltd Peer · rank #5 | TC TONY COOK LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £5.2m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £93.4m | — | £4.8m | £3.5m | £9.1m | £1.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 16 | 1 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —