Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Marrfish Ltd t/a National Seafood Consortium stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 14 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMarrfish Ltd t/a National Seafood Consortium(You)Turner and Price LimitedBrakes A Sysco CompanyHoldsworthBestWay LimitedBlakemores FoodService
iAuto-picked from 14 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TA Turner and Price Limited Peer · rank #1 | BA Brakes A Sysco Company Peer · rank #2 | ML Marrfish Ltd t/a National Seafood Consortium (You) · target supplier | HO Holdsworth Peer · rank #4 | BE BestWay Limited Peer · rank #5 | BF Blakemores FoodService Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £8.8m | £140k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.9m | — | — | — | — | £1.5m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £108.2m | £140k | — | £63.6m | £3.0m | £1.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 1 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —