Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Nasa stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNasa(You)Allpay LimitedBlackhawk Network EMEA LtdProtector InsuranceZurich Insurance Company Ltd t/a Zurich MunicipalTyne and Wear Pension Fund
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AL Allpay Limited Peer · rank #1 | BN Blackhawk Network EMEA Ltd Peer · rank #2 | PI Protector Insurance Peer · rank #3 | NA Nasa (You) · target supplier | ZI Zurich Insurance Company Ltd t/a Zurich Municipal Peer · rank #5 | TA Tyne and Wear Pension Fund Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £11.5m | £10.2m | £6.3m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £210.9m | £81.2m | £118.6m | £5.7m(−93%) | £24.2m | £7.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 7 | 7 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —