Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Urban Vision stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUrban Vision(You)Matrix SCM LimitedATKINS LIMITEDBJSS LimitedConexia LimitedTriple Point Investment Management LLP
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #1 | AT ATKINS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BJ BJSS Limited Peer · rank #3 | CO Conexia Limited Peer · rank #4 | UV Urban Vision (You) · target supplier | TP Triple Point Investment Management LLP Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £19.5m | £9.9m | £5.0m | £459k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £125k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.7bn | £1.2bn | £1.0bn | £286.3m | £557k(−100%) | £38.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —