Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Lancashire County Council (Facilities Management) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLancashire County Council (Facilities Management)(You)KGB CLEANING SOUTH WEST LIMITEDORIAN SOLUTIONS LIMITEDKINGDOM SERVICES GROUP LIMITEDECC Electronic Engineering(Lot 1) Hayward Services Limited,(Lot 2) N-Viro Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC KGB CLEANING SOUTH WEST LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | OS ORIAN SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | KS KINGDOM SERVICES GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | LC Lancashire County Council (Facilities Management) (You) · target supplier | EE ECC Electronic Engineering Peer · rank #5 | (1 (Lot 1) Hayward Services Limited,(Lot 2) N-Viro Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £10.4m | £4.2m | £1.4m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £53.6m | £37.9m | £103.4m | £2.8m(−93%) | £10.8m | £6.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 6 | 5 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —